🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.